Prediction of Sigrid Fick vs Margaret Lowe Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

S. Fick vs M. Lowe

Sigrid Fick
Sigrid Fick

Flag SWE SWE

w
w
w
w
w
l
l
w
w
w
Margaret Lowe
Margaret Lowe

Flag GBR GBR

l
l
w
l
l
l
l

2

Win

2

Played

0

Win

138
Age
0
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Fick 2 - 0 Lowe

They have played 2 sets in total, with Sigrid Fick winning 2 and Margaret Lowe winning 0. The last match between Sigrid Fick and Margaret Lowe was at the Cannes Cote dAzur Chps, 23-03-1920, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Sigrid Fick getting the victory 6-3 6-2.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Fick2
Lowe0
Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R3Cannes Cote dAzur Chps(03-23-20)

Clay
SWE Flag
Sigrid Fick
6
6
GBR Flag
Margaret Lowe
3
2

(Menton(03-08-20)

Clay
SWE Flag
Sigrid Fick
GBR Flag
Margaret Lowe

S. Fick vs M. Lowe H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
60.98% (50-32)Career Total W/L14.29% (1-6)
2Clay0
2Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

S. Fick vs M. Lowe Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sigrid Fick has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Margaret Lowe has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sigrid Fick, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Margaret Lowe has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Sigrid Fick has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Margaret Lowe has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Sigrid Fick has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Margaret Lowe winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Sigrid Fick has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 100% (W/L 9/0), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 30/30). Margaret Lowe has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 100% (W/L 1/5), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
  • Player level: In the last year, Sigrid Fick has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Margaret Lowe has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Sigrid Fick winning 1 times and Margaret Lowe being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sigrid Fick winning 2 and Margaret Lowe winning 0.
  • The last match between Sigrid Fick and Margaret Lowe was at the Cannes Cote dAzur Chps, 23-03-1920, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Sigrid Fick getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sigrid Fick has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Margaret Lowe has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sigrid Fick has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Margaret Lowe has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Sigrid Fick has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Margaret Lowe has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Sigrid Fick vs Margaret Lowe Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

S. Fick vs M. Lowe H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
12Games Won5
0:0:0Average Match Time0:0:0
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Fick 0%, Lowe 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Fick 0%, Lowe 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Fick 0%, Lowe 0%.

S. Fick Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
N/ADjursholm - 14-08-1932

F

SWEG. Roberg
W
?-? ?-?
CarpetStockholm Indoors - 20-04-1932

F

SWEE. Aquilon
W
?-? ?-?
ClayStockholm - 24-08-1931

F

SWEE. Cederholm
W
6-1 6-2
ClayOslo - 11-06-1931

SF

NORA. Werring
L
UNK
CarpetStockholm Indoors - 30-03-1931

F

SWEE. Aquilon
L
?-? ?-? ?-?

M. Lowe Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
GrassQueens Club - 17-06-1929

R2

GBRJ. Ridley
L
6-1 6-0
ClayCannes Chps - 29-03-1920

R3

GBRM. J
L
6-0 1-0 RET
ClayCannes Cote dAzur Chps - 23-03-1920

R3

SWES. Fick
L
6-3 6-2
ClayMenton - 08-03-1920

R4

FRAS. Lenglen
W
W/O

SWES. Fick
L
W/O
banner

S. Fick vs M. Lowe Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
60.98% (50/32)YTD Win/Loss14.29% (1/6)
58.57% (82/58)Sets Win/Loss0.00% (0/10)
54.36% (623/523)Games Win/Loss19.72% (14/57)
50.00% (30/30)Clay Win/Loss16.67% (1/5)
84.62% (11/2)Indoor Hard W/L0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)Grass Win/Loss0.00% (0/1)
1st MatchAverage Match Time1st Match
60% (40/67)Best of 3 Sets Win %0% (0/5)
67% (4/6)Deciding Set Win %0% (0/0)
100% (38/38)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (38/0)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
7% (29/2)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (5/0)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Wed, 26 Nov, 06:30 PM
Prediction
BOLJ. C. P. Angelo5
ARGG. Villanueva
W1
1.37
W2
2.8
Fri, 28 Nov, 08:00 AM
Prediction
SWEE. Ymer1
ROUD. N. Cazacu
W1
1.139
W2
4.8
Thu, 27 Nov, 02:30 AM
Prediction
AUSP. MarinkovLL
AUSA. Bolt4
W1
4.85
W2
1.134
Thu, 27 Nov, 02:00 PM
Prediction
RUSA. VatutinLL
PORH. Rocha4
W1
2.64
W2
1.41
Wed, 26 Nov, 07:30 PM
Prediction
COLN. Barrientosq
MEXJ. A. Hernandez
W1
1.84
W2
1.84
Thu, 27 Nov, 01:00 PM
Prediction
ITAL. Giustino7
SVKA. Martinq
W1
1.54
W2
2.28